Jump to content

Chemgeek And Waterbear, Question On Safety


Matt38

Recommended Posts

Years ago we had a discussion on the safety of chlorine. I know generally you guys like chlorine and so do I. After reading this AMA on reddit and digging down into the publications, my concern about chlorine has resurfaced. Are you up on the latest research and what is your interpretation? The researcher suggests that silver ion may be a safer alternative (buried in the responses). Not being an experimentalist, I'm not able to quickly quantify the bladder cancer risk. I don't mind spending a much greater amount of money on frequent water and silver ion cartridge changes, but I'm wondering if those have their own unknown and not well discussed risk from the MPS. I realize it still uses chlorine, but much much less.

https://www.reddit.com/r/science/comments/4wvrjd/american_chemical_society_ama_i_am_susan_d/

edit:here is the referenced article on bladder cancer http://aje.oxfordjournals.org/content/165/2/148.abstract

It's very easy to focus on things that don't pose very much risk based on statements like "twice the risk" even if you are still much more likley to get hit by lightning.

Thanks!

Matt

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...