Richard, again you are correct. I thought about wording my statement differently, and I guess I should have now. TDS has does not really say you have salt in the water, but TDS will go up as the salt levels do. TDS is measuring all dissolved solids in the water. The reason you have a higher tds when using liquid chlorine is because liquid chlorine is sodium hypochloride, which contains salt. So all I am saying is that TDS levels will be the highest in pools that use liquid chlorine, with the sodium causing that. used to be that when tds got 1000-1500, pool stores would tell you to do a partial drain to dillute it, as you might have a hard time dissolving any solids in it. Well now with salt water systems, tds is up to 4600 or more, with salt levels being at 3200.
Water Saturation
Yeah, pool stores have said lots of things that aren't true. It is not true that a higher TDS makes it harder to dissolve any solids in it. Water simply doesn't get saturated that way. Saturation occurs for each chemical compound separately where the product of concentrations of the component species exceeds the solubility product at which point one gets precipitate. This is done intentionally for calcium ions and carbonate ions, for example, through adjustment of TA (adjusted for CYA), CH and pH though there is also a dependency on temperature and TDS. Even for calcium carbonate, however, it is able to dissolve more readily at higher TDS levels. This is because TDS, especially when measured using a conductivity meter (as opposed to evaporation of water with measurement of resulting solids) is related to the ionic strength of the water and higher ionic strength makes charged species (ions) behave as if they are at lower concentrations then they actually are -- essentially, the higher ionic strength means that ions "shield" other ions in terms of their electrostatic potential and that makes them less reactive behaving as if they are less concentrated. Basically, this means that salt pools require a higher TA, CH and/or pH combination (at the same CYA level) as non-salt pools in order to prevent plaster corrosion.
The saturation limit for salt (sodium chloride) in water is roughly 360,000 ppm (35.9 g/L) so well beyond what even sea water contains (sea water is roughly 35,000 ppm). Cyanuric Acid (CYA) has a solubility limit of around 2000 ppm. Sodium Bicarbonate (baking soda; Alkalinity Up) has a solubility limit of around 78,000 ppm. In practical terms, it is Calcium Carbonate that is the primary saturation factor one should be concerned about. If the water is not saturated with calcium carbonate, then plaster/grout can dissolve; if the water if over-saturated with calcium carbonate, then scale can form. The saturation index may be calculated from the other water parameters by using
The Pool Calculator. Other substances where solubility is particularly important are other metal ions including copper and silver since these can precipitate as metal stains if these concentrations get too high and/or the pH gets high. The limited solubility of Lanthanum Phosphate is intentionally used in phosphate remover products since they contain Lanthanum Chloride and forcibly precipitate phosphate out of the water.
Chemical Additions
Though it is true that sodium hypochlorite contains salt and therefore has the salt and TDS levels rise faster when you use that source of chlorine, it is also true that ALL sources of chlorine result in a salt and TDS rise (unless there is dilution) because when chlorine gets used up it gets converted to chloride. This occurs when it breaks down from sunlight or when it oxidizes ammonia or organics. As I mentioned before, sodium hypochlorite adds salt twice as fast as Trichlor and Dichlor, but they all increase salt levels and that isn't a big deal. The CYA added from Trichlor and Dichlor are a MUCH bigger deal since they add proportionately much more CYA relative to normal CYA levels than they add to salt. Cal-Hypo increases Calcium Hardness (CH), but it too adds proportionately less relative to normal levels. As a specific example, let's assume a pool has a CH of 300 ppm, CYA of 50 ppm, salt level (roughly TDS) of 750 ppm. Adding 1 ppm FC per day for 1 month does the following:
[EDIT] I corrected the salt levels below for all sources [END-EDIT]
With Trichlor, CYA increases by 18 ppm so by 100%*18/50 = 36%
With Trichlor, salt increases by 25 ppm so by 100%*25/750 = 3.3%
With Dichlor, CYA increases by 27 ppm so by 100%*27/50 = 54%
With Dichlor, salt increases by 25 ppm so by 100%*25/750 = 3.3%
With Cal-Hypo, CH increases by 21 ppm so by 100%*21/300 = 7%
With Cal-Hypo, salt increases by about 31 ppm so by 100%*31/750 = 4.1%
With Sodium Hypochlorite (or lithium hypochlorite), salt increases by 49 ppm so by 100%*49/750 = 6.5%
You can see that Trichlor and Dichlor proportionately increase CYA by a lot. As noted earlier, one can run into problems in just one season, depending on the specific situation (i.e. rate of dilution). To keep the CYA constant from use of Trichlor would require dilution of the water
every month by 26%. To prevent algae growth, one has several alternatives when the CYA is higher: 1) raise the FC proportionately to keep the FC/CYA ratio constant (see
this chart or 2) use an alagecide (e.g. PolyQuat 60 weekly) or a phosphate remover.
Cal-Hypo increases CH, but not that much proportionately so it takes a while before it affects the saturation index in a serious way. Even after 6 months, the CH would only rise from 300 ppm to 426 ppm raising the saturation index by 0.12 units which isn't very much -- over several years or with higher chlorine usage this could be a problem, but to go from 426 back to 300 ppm using fill water with no CH requires a dilution of 30%.
Sodium Hypochlorite increases salt faster, but proportionately it's far less than the rate of CYA increase from Trichlor and Dichlor and is even less than the rate of increase in CH from Cal-Hypo. Even after 6 months, the salt would only rise from 750 ppm to 1044 ppm and would require 28% dilution to get the salt level back down.
TDS and "age" of water
The one possible reasonable use for TDS (other than in the calcium carbonate saturation index calculation) is as a proxy for the "age" of the water. When a pool gets used over time by bathers, they do introduce a variety of organic substances into the water some of which do not get readily oxidized or broken down so may become insoluble more readily. An extreme example of this is with lotions and oils that form on the water or produce gummy scum lines (not scale, which is calcium carbonate). However, since this effect is dependent more on bather load than on the age of the water (represented by the cumulative amount of chlorine that is added over time), TDS isn't a very good parameter to use for this purpose. Perhaps some combination of TDS, type of chlorine used, and typical bather load would be useful. A formula used in spas for determining when a water change is needed is the following:
Water Replacement Interval (WRI) = (1/3) x (Spa Volume in U.S. Gallons) / (Number of Bathers per Day)
The main problem with the above forumla is that it does not account for different soak times since soaking longer results in more bather waste products. The above probably assumes an average soak time of around 15-20 minutes. A better formula would use a bather-hour parameter. For pools, a proposed rule from APSP is to replace 7 gallons of pool water per bather (and again, this really should be based on bather-hours).
The main fallacy of using TDS, however, is that it doesn't take into account bather load. If you weren't using an outdoor pool at all, you'd still need to add chlorine regularly due to breakdown of chlorine from sunlight (even with CYA protecting it), so TDS will rise but there would be no bather wastes. The pool water does not go "bad" in this situation. The salt level rises, but as noted above, that's not a problem until the salt gets very high. At high bather loads, most of the chlorine is used to oxidize the ammonia and urea from sweat and urine so here TDS is a reasonable proxy for that bather load, BUT one must take into account the type of chlorine being used. Sodium Hypochlorite will increase TDS (and salt) twice as fast as Trichlor for the same amount of chlorine so equating TDS to the amount of bather waste in conditions of high bather load means you have to account for that and allow for a greater rise in TDS when using sodium hypochlorite. That is, a rise in TDS of 500 with Trichlor is the same as a rise in TDS of 1000 with Sodium Hypochlorite in terms of what it means for the amount of chlorine that has cumulatively added and the presumed amount of bather waste in a high bather load scenario.
pH of Chlorine Products
Another fallacy told by most pool stores and the industry as a whole is that Dichlor is close to pH neutral while the hypochlorite sources of chlorine, including Sodium Hypochlorite, are high in pH. This is only true for the initial chemical addition, but neglects to take into account what happens when the chlorine gets used up (consumed). The consumption of chlorine is an acidic process and makes the ongoing use of Dichlor net acidic and the ongoing use of hypochlorite sources of chlorine close to pH neutral (except for the small amount of "excess lye" in these products). I only use 12.5% chlorinating liquid in my pool at a rate (during the summer) of around 1 ppm FC per day. Based on the pH of the added chlorine, I should see my pH rise from 7.5 to 7.8 in just one week and to 8.6 in one month, but in fact my pool's pH is very stable rising around 0.1-0.2 over about 1 month. The reason is that the consumption of chlorine is acidic as detailed in
this post.
pH Rise from TA in Pools
So where does the rise in pH in many pools come from? It comes from the fact that pools are intentionally over-carbonated which is what Total Alkalinity (TA) mostly measures (it mostly measures bicarbonate). This over-carbonation is intentional in order to provide a pH buffer to minimize swings in pH and in order to saturate the water with calcium carbonate in order to prevent dissolving of plaster. However, this over-carbonation leads to the outgassing of carbon dioxide from the pool into the air and this makes the pool rise in pH (you are essentially removing carbonic acid from the water; removing an acid makes the pH rise). This outgassing occurs faster at higher TA levels, lower pH and with more aeration of the water. It turns out that the effect of higher TA on the outgassing rate is greater than the effect of TA on pH buffering so the net result with higher TA is a faster rise in pH over time. So the solution is simply to maintain a lower TA level (adjusting CH and pH as appropriate to maintain a saturation index near zero). These same principles apply to saltwater chlorine generator (SWG) pools as well, though there are some other factors that may be at play there such as chlorine outgassing (from undissolved chlorine gas).
Richard