Bubbles Make Us Cough
#1
Posted 18 November 2007 - 03:01 PM
#2
Posted 19 November 2007 - 07:08 AM
#3
Posted 29 November 2007 - 04:57 PM
giving it a shot
#4
Posted 30 November 2007 - 11:40 PM
giving it a shot
'more_air', I’m not a doctor, but what you’re describing is similar to Hot tub lung.
http://www.mayoclini...ub-lung/AN00660
http://www.webmd.com...-may-hurt-lungs
I also posted a link that dispels this finding.
http://findarticles....42/ai_104211201
This article is written by someone from the pool/spa industry so keep that in consideration.
This report from the Mayo Clinic has persuaded me to change my water when 2 months arrive and continue to do this thereafter. The spa companies suggest 3 months and the Mayo Clinic says 1 month so 2 I feel is a good compromise.
#5
Posted 01 December 2007 - 01:14 AM
It is also true that the additional buildup of organics in the water could also potentially interfere with chlorine's effectiveness (after all, CYA is an organic compound, though somewhat unique in the way it acts as a chlorine buffer) so changing the water after 3 months still makes sense. It's just that CYA is a known culprit in terms of sanitation reduction so I suggest not intentionally increasing its concentration through continued use of Dichlor.
The statement in the Mayo Clinic article that "added chlorine loses most of its disinfectant properties at temperatures above 84 F (29 C)" is simply not true. CT disinfection tables show that chlorine is actually more effective (has lower CT values) at higher temperatures. What this article may be referring to is that the rate of loss of chlorine from outgassing and breakdown from general reactions including oxidizing organics or ammonia happens faster at higher temperatures so it gets used up more rapidly. However, that can be compensated by using more chlorine or adding it more frequently or using a non-chlorine shock (MPS) to help reduce chlorine demand.
I can't prove that Dichlor is the culprit behind some of the hot tub lung cases. It's just a hunch based on some known chemistry, but as most industry professionals will tell you, real-life pools and spas have complicated chemistry not always matching what is found in the lab. Of course, I would just prefer that one tries a little harder to understand this more complex chemistry, but pools and spas don't get the same sort of focus as, say, atmospheric chemistry (ozone layer, greenhouse gas models, etc.).
Richard
#6
Posted 01 December 2007 - 06:07 AM
Richard, you are correct...chlorine is more effective at higher temps until you reach somewhere near 140 degress. Not sure where the 84 F number comes from but every once in a while this comes up.
#7
Posted 01 December 2007 - 07:08 AM
Of course, I would just prefer that one tries a little harder to understand this more complex chemistry, but pools and spas don't get the same sort of focus as, say, atmospheric chemistry (ozone layer, greenhouse gas models, etc.).
Richard
Richard, I use 1 oz liquid chlorine after tub use and shock with dichlor every Sunday. Would I get better sanitation performance switching to common bleach?
#8
Posted 01 December 2007 - 10:20 AM
You can shock with liquid chlorine (bleach) instead of Dichlor. The only difference between the two would be that the Dichlor shocking adds to CYA in addition to chlorine. You would get more consistent sanitation if you did that -- start with Dichlor for a week or two after a tub refill and then switch to liquid chlorine (bleach) for both dosing and shocking. To add 10 ppm FC, it would take about 7.5 fluid ounces in 350 gallons. One problem with shocking with chlorine is that it the FC is higher the next day. So you really don't need to shock unless you have to (more on that later).
You don't have to use a non-chlorine shock, MPS. It does help break down organics better than chlorine and it does help reduce chlorine consumption because of that. It also helps prevent the formation of chloramines. However, it has the downside of making some people break out if they are sensitive to it. If you find that the water gets dull or has an oil film or scum lines, you can use other products to deal with such issues including enzymes and scum balls (I didn't find them as effective as MPS for my pool, but every person's situation is different).
Be sure to keep the cover off for up to an hour after shocking, though 15 minutes would really help. During shocking, there is more formation of chlorine byproducts that outgas and aren't good for the cover.
Finally, if you don't measure significant Combined Chlorine (say, > 0.5 ppm), then you probably do not need to shock. This is most especially true in an outdoor pool exposed to sunlight where shocking is rarely needed -- if you do a regular (daily or after each use) dose to 4 ppm FC then you certainly won't need to shock for sanitation. A hot tub or spa that gets used a lot, however, builds up organics much faster and is not exposed to the UV rays of sunlight so usually needs to be shocked at least occasionally.
Richard
#9
Posted 01 December 2007 - 12:58 PM
You can shock with liquid chlorine (bleach) instead of Dichlor. The only difference between the two would be that the Dichlor shocking adds to CYA in addition to chlorine. You would get more consistent sanitation if you did that -- start with Dichlor for a week or two after a tub refill and then switch to liquid chlorine (bleach) for both dosing and shocking. To add 10 ppm FC, it would take about 7.5 fluid ounces in 350 gallons. One problem with shocking with chlorine is that it the FC is higher the next day. So you really don't need to shock unless you have to (more on that later).
You don't have to use a non-chlorine shock, MPS. It does help break down organics better than chlorine and it does help reduce chlorine consumption because of that. It also helps prevent the formation of chloramines. However, it has the downside of making some people break out if they are sensitive to it. If you find that the water gets dull or has an oil film or scum lines, you can use other products to deal with such issues including enzymes and scum balls (I didn't find them as effective as MPS for my pool, but every person's situation is different).
Be sure to keep the cover off for up to an hour after shocking, though 15 minutes would really help. During shocking, there is more formation of chlorine byproducts that outgas and aren't good for the cover.
Finally, if you don't measure significant Combined Chlorine (say, > 0.5 ppm), then you probably do not need to shock. This is most especially true in an outdoor pool exposed to sunlight where shocking is rarely needed -- if you do a regular (daily or after each use) dose to 4 ppm FC then you certainly won't need to shock for sanitation. A hot tub or spa that gets used a lot, however, builds up organics much faster and is not exposed to the UV rays of sunlight so usually needs to be shocked at least occasionally.
Richard
Richard, I was under the assumption that liquid chlorine had more chlorine than Bleach. I'm adding Liquid Chlorine from the yellow refill that the pool supply house sells.
#10
Posted 01 December 2007 - 03:53 PM
#11
Posted 01 December 2007 - 04:36 PM
You will use half the volume if using 10-12 percent liquid chlorine vs 5-6 percent liquid chlorine.
#12
Posted 02 December 2007 - 05:22 AM
You will use half the volume if using 10-12 percent liquid chlorine vs 5-6 percent liquid chlorine.
Tony, you and Richard are going to think I'm thick.
#13
Posted 02 December 2007 - 09:20 AM
biggz, there are no bad questions.
1 oz of the pool liquid chlorine (sometimes called pool shock) should bring your 300 gals to 2.5 - 3 ppm free chlorine which is pretty much where I bring my spa to after soaking. If you increase the dosage, you will not build up CYA as in using dichlor. Liquid chlorine is just double strength bleach and contains zero CYA. Your best bet is to dose and wait about 20 - 30 minutes and test for free chlorine. You will soon get a feel for your spas typical chlorine demand. This changes with number of soakers, etc. but you will get a very good idea of what your spa takes and can back off testing after a while.
#14
Posted 02 December 2007 - 06:47 PM
You aren't thick -- I'm the one that calculated the dosage amount assuming 6% bleach while you are using stronger chlorinating liquid. Tony is right.
Richard
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










